Von: Brigitte Kratzwald
That would mean that also “reputation” is not so important as before? Because, if I work for fun, I don’t need reputation in reward? I think, this is a good way, as individuals competing for reputation...
View ArticleVon: Required or facilitated reciprocity? | Create commons!
[...] gives us some interesting perspectives on sharing and producing freely on the blog keimform. In Required or facilitated reciprocity? he outlines som arguments pro and con required reciprocity...
View ArticleVon: Christian Siefkes
<p>@Brigitte:</p> <blockquote> <p>That would mean that also “reputation” is not so important as before? Because, if I work for fun, I don’t need reputation in reward?</p>...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Von: John
“If that doesn’t work, i.e. if too many people opt out, the community would doubtlessly agree on more formal sanctions, such as restricting the consumptive options of those who refuse.” Consumption...
View ArticleVon: Why not just pay someone when needed? — keimform.de
[...] continues the discussion on required vs. facilitated reciprocity that took place on the jox mailing list. Michel Bauwens remained skeptical that stigmergic [...]
View ArticleVon: In what sense are markets “totalitarian”? — keimform.de
[...] (possibly in the form of generalized reciprocity) exists in every society, as I pointed out before. And if “exchange” means relations of the form “if you do/give me this, I’ll do/give you [...]
View ArticleVon: P2P Foundation » Blog Archive » Evolving from requiring to facilitating...
[...] (original article with links, via Keimform, here) [...]
View ArticleVon: Required or facilitated reciprocity? | Peer2Politics | Scoop.it
[...] The following post is based on twomailsI wrote as part of a discussion on the jox mailing list (a relict of the short-lived[DE] CSPP journal) at the end of March. I try to explain why I have...
View Article
